Monday, March 30, 2009
Do The Referee's Play Favorites?
I see a lot of discussion about how the referee's seem to favor certain players when it comes to calling penalties; especially when the game is on the line. While it doesn't hurt to have a kid named Sidney on your team, I don't think that there is any kind of conspiracy by the referee's or pressure by the NHL office to see to it that some teams make it into the playoffs, but at the same time the referee's are human and are well aware that some teams and players are "more equal" than others, and may unconsciously lean a little toward certain players when it comes to penalties. On the other hand, I watched a game recently where the star named Sid was getting banged around all through the game, without nary a call. There can be a fine line in protecting a star player from constant harassment and abuse , and in allowing the opposing team to try and neutralize the key players.
Washington Capitals Hockey
Sports and Culture
Saturday, March 28, 2009
Hockey....Then and Now
Washington Capitals Hockey
Sports and Culture
Sunday, March 22, 2009
NHL Needs to Ditch the Dive Penalty
Washington Capitals Hockey
Saturday, March 21, 2009
NHL Playoff Structure
Another thing I like about the NHL playoffs, is that each series consists of a best of 7 and not some lame best of 5 like Major League baseball has with their divisional playoffs. In a seven game series, the better team is going to win most of the time as compared to a best of five, where a team can throw a couple of dominant pitchers out there, and win the first two games virtually locking up the series before it even gets started. More than any other sport, the NHL playoffs are an endurance test, and the teams that get to the Stanley Cup Finals have earned their way their. While many people talk about the excitement of March Madness, I look forward to the excitement of NHL playoff hockey, and it's wars.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Brodeur Breaks Record
How Important is the Plus/Minus Rating?
While watching a game, one of the statistics that they like to profile is the plus/minus rating of the players. The way that it works is that a player gets a plus if a goal is scored while they are on the ice, and conversely they receive a minus if a goal is scored against them while they are out there. While every player would want to have a great plus minus rating, there's several factors that come into play. First off, you have to be on a pretty decent team to have any realistic chance of having a great plus/minus rating. For instance, Brendan Witt of the New York Islanders has one of the worse ratings of -32. Is this terrible stat because he plays on one of the worst teams in the NHL or the fact that he's not having a very good year? Probably both, but I'm quite certain that if Witt played for the Red Wings or the Bruins his numbers would look a lot different. For instance, the only player on the Bruins who has a minus rating of more than -1 is Mark Recchi and that's because Recchi played most of the year for the lowly Tampa Bay Lighting, and was just recently traded to the Bruins.
While all players would love to have a great plus/minus rating I think it's obvious that it has as much to do with who you play for, and while the number is interesting to chart, doesn't necessarily reflect the true value of a player.